For those who haven't consented to having their messages be public, that content is still accessible on AnswerOverflow it just requires to be signed in and in the server as that's not breaking the ToS. Since AnswerOverflow tries to be fully compliant with Discords ToS to have no risk to me or the server owners it's a part of it doesn't publicly display messages from users who haven't consented. Not all of your content is publicly displayed. My approach would be closer to an upvote/downvote system for answers to use that for content filtering however that is not implemented yet Less developer focused, the intention of AnswerOverflow is to be more of a general search engine for content on Discord servers so I don't currently have planned support for things such as looking at last commit messages to determine the relevance of the content. I'm doing a refresh of the frontend in about a month and when I do I'll be implementing server side rendering but for now this is not implementedĬommunities don't have the option to redirect to their own domain, I don't plan on implementing this as a part of AnswerOverflow Server side rendering removes the reliance on search engines ability to render your page improving indexing ability. Users can manage all of their indexed content on a per channel basis and also all edits / deleted are synced in near real time
The paid elements would be in the form of premium statistics such as insights into the most helpful members of your community, popular questions, etc - equivalent to Discord Nitro where it's freemium
We happy few ephemeral linen free#
It's free to use, to expand on the pricing model, the plan is to keep base features free forever, anything that helps with indexing messages so marking as solution, indexing channels, etc. Supports marking the solution to questionsĪnswerOverflow has a general search that covers all servers that use AnswerOverflow to index them Hi! I was linked to this issue from IvyLashes on Discord after getting in contact with them about AnswerOverflow and asked to share a breakdown of the pros / cons of AnswerOverflow vs the competition so I'll post those belowįully compliant with Discords' Terms Of Service, in their ToS it says you can't publicly disclose users data that you get from the API without their consent so AnswerOverflow has a system for getting user consent How exactly does Linen handle threads? Will they be able to support the new forum features?.do we want to allow users to opt-out of having their name shared? Of having their.do we want to censor names of users completely? This should be feasible, but reduces the credit granted.Do we want a similar or integrated solution? Edit: these are indexed fine. Github Discussions similarly do not seem to be indexed.what happens if and when the service we're using to do this goes out of business, or starts charging a non-trivial fee?.This is particularly bad because our rate of breaking changes is extremely high answers for old Bevy versions will be archived online, which may mislead users.This would not be the "highly curated Q&A" of Stack Overflow help threads are generally quite casual they often contain poorly formed questions and off-the-cuff answer.mild violation of privacy: by default, names and content of #help will be posted online.boosts Bevy's SEO rank by providing tons of valuable content that we can host.makes common questions and answers discoverable via search engines.
We happy few ephemeral linen archive#
We could archive these threads in a search-indexed fashion using v or one of their competitors. Discord help threads are ephemeral, but remain extremely popular as a method to get help.
0 kommentar(er)
